Help Shape Future Societies Into Great Ones Religion Essays

Help Shape Future Societies Into Great Ones Religion Essays Help Shape Future Societies Into Great Ones Religion Essay Help Shape Future Societies Into Great Ones Religion Essay The Hebrew s left small literature to demo their imposts. In fact the lone literature that is left from Hebrew society is spiritual text. The nucleus literary plants being the Torah or Pentateuch, which is the first five books of the Bible. These plants were non compiled together as a aggregation of books until after the autumn of the Hebrew state. From these texts we learn several things about how they lived. They were a really rigorous society. They were non anthropocentric, but believed that God was the lone of import being. This civilization had a monotheistic belief. The God that they worshiped was a merely God and they did non inquiry Him. God had full control over what took topographic point in their civilization. If they questioned God they believed that they would be punished. Though Hebraic civilization is really different from modern twenty-four hours civilization, there are three of import inside informations that are still relevant today. First Hebrew civilization was a Patriarchal society. Following, dress was of import to the position of adult male. Last, justness was of import to their life style. Throughout this essay I am traveling to explicate how these things were prevailing to their society and how they are still a portion of ours today. One manner that modern civilization is similar to the Hebrew s is that it was a Patriarchal society. In the narrative of Noah in the book of Genesis no names of the adult females are mentioned. Though our society has come a long manner in this country. We are still a adult male first society. In a matrimony the adult females usually take the adult male s last name. A traditional nuptials normally ends with the phrase I now present to you Mr. and Mrs. insert adult male s name here. In most two-parent places the adult male is the caput of the family. This is true in my household at least. Work forces are normally the 1s that hold most of the high-level occupations in America. Most political places are hel p by work forces every bit good. They normally make a higher income than adult females in the same place as them. In the narrative of creative activity the Hebrew s viewed Eve in a low-level place and believe that she was the ground for the autumn of adult male. This sets the phase for how from here on out adult females are nt mentioned as much and are in lower places in the Torah. Though our society is nt nigh every bit patriarchal as the Hebrew s were, we still have plentifulness of gender inequality. Another trait of Hebrew civilization that is still seeable today is how apparels were of import and showed the position of adult male. This is apparent in the narrative of Joseph, which is besides in the book of Genesis. The coat that Joseph is given signified wealth. The Jews loved holding a batch of colour in their apparels. The length of a coat besides was of import in the household. As Joseph rose in power his apparels exemplified more wealth. As he fell in power or position he w as stripped of his apparels or had rags as garments. In our society today apparels frequently do demo position. Peoples want to purchase the top trade names so they can lift to a higher position or at least appear like they are of a higher category. Peoples in high places are expected to have on nicer vesture than those in the lower categories. Peoples think that this happens merely in high school with striplings but this is common in grownups every bit good. The high priced shops that wealthy, high-toned people store at, guarantee that it is non easy for low category people to shop where they shop. Clothing, like in the Hebrew civilization shows position of the societies people. Third, justness was an property that was of import to the Hebrew s. It is something that is besides of import in our society despite the fact that we view it really otherwise than the Hebrew s did in their clip. Their position of justness is displayed in how God punishes His people. It is shown in many of t he literary plants that we have studied. The narrative of Creation shows their position of justness. Adam was sentenced to a life of difficult work along with every other homo that was to come. Eve would endure from birth strivings and the snake would eat soil. God had justness how he saw tantrum. That would be how the Hebrew s viewed this state of affairs. Justice is besides showed in the narrative of Noah and the Tower of Babel. Today we look at justness a small spot different. Our thoughts of justness seem to come largely from the courtroom. We think of guilty until proved inexperienced person or an oculus for an oculus. We surely question things unlike the Hebrew s. The truth is that justness is a complex thing in our societies eyes. We doubtless do nt hold a perfect justness system, but it is something that we view really extremely, much like the Hebrew s. In decision, the Hebrew civilization has passed on a few things to our modern twenty-four hours society. We differ in many countries but through clip and many different civilisations all of the civilizations have formed our society into what it is today. The literature that has been left behind from all civilizations has given us a glance into how our manner of life has developed into what it is today. The Hebrew traditions passed along to us the characteristic of a patriarchal society. Though because of this, life in the past and partially now has been more hard for adult females. Hebrew s besides related to us in the fact that vesture is of import to demoing the position of adult male. Last, they valued justness. Even though they valued it really otherwise than our society, it was still of import to them, much like it is to our society. Traditions are passed down from coevalss to coevalss as they are passed down things alteration. We recognize that through the literature that we read from the past civilizations. As clip goes by and more literature is written we will finally be the past civilizations. What we are go forthing behind today could assist determine future societies into great 1s!

How to Calculate Powerball Odds

How to Calculate Powerball Odds Powerball is a multistate lottery that is quite popular due to its multimillion-dollar jackpots. Some of these jackpots reach values that are well over $100 million. An interesting quest ion from a probabilistic  sense is, â€Å"How are the odds calculated on the likelihood of winning Powerball?† The Rules First we will examine the rules of Powerball as it is currently configured. During each drawing, two drums full of balls are thoroughly mixed and randomized. The first drum contains white balls numbered 1 to 59. Five are drawn without replacement from this drum. The second drum has red balls that are numbered from 1 to 35. One of these is drawn. The object is to match as many of these numbers as possible. The Prizes The full jackpot is won when all six numbers selected by a player match perfectly with the balls that are drawn. There are prizes with lesser values for partial matching, for a total of nine different ways to win some dollar amount from Powerball. These ways of winning are: Matching all five white balls and the red ball wins the grand prize jackpot. The value of this varies depending upon how long it has been since someone has won this grand prize.Matching all five white balls but not the red ball wins $1,000,000.Matching exactly four of the five white balls and the red ball wins $10,000.Matching exactly four of the five white balls but not the red ball wins $100.Matching exactly three of the five white balls and the red ball wins $100.Matching exactly three of the five white balls but not the red ball wins $7.Matching exactly two of the five white balls and the red ball wins $7.Matching exactly one of the five white balls and the red ball wins $4.Matching just the red ball but none of the white balls wins $4. We will look at how to calculate each of these probabilities. Throughout these calculations, it is important to note that the order of how the balls come out of the drum is not important. The only thing that matters is the set of balls that are drawn. For this reason our calculations involve combinations and not permutations. Also useful in every calculation below is the total number of combinations that can be drawn. We have five selected from the 59 white balls, or using the notation for combinations, C(59, 5) 5,006,386 ways for this to occur. There are 35 ways to select the red ball, resulting in 35 x 5,006,386 175,223,510 possible selections. Jackpot Although the jackpot of matching all six balls is the most difficult to obtain, it is the easiest probability to calculate. Out of the multitude of 175,223,510 possible selections, there is exactly one way to win the jackpot. Thus the probability that a particular ticket wins the jackpot is 1/175,223,510. Five White Balls To win $1,000,000 we need to match the five white balls, but not the red one. There is only one way to match all five. There are 34 ways to not match the red ball. So the probability of winning $1,000,000 is 34/175,223,510, or approximately 1/5,153,633. Four White Balls and One Red For a prize of $10,000, we must match four of the five white balls and the red one. There are C(5,4) 5 ways to match four of the five. The fifth ball must be one of the remaining 54 that were not drawn, and so there are C(54, 1) 54 ways for this to happen. There is only 1 way to match the red ball. This means that there are 5 x 54 x 1 270 ways to match exactly four white balls and the red one, giving a probability of 270/175,223,510, or approximately 1/648,976. Four White Balls and No Red One way to win a prize of $100 is to match four of the five white balls and not match the red one. As in the previous case, there are C(5,4) 5 ways to match four of the five. The fifth ball must be one of the remaining 54 that were not drawn, and so there are C(54, 1) 54 ways for this to happen. This time, there are 34 ways to not match the red ball. This means that there are 5 x 54 x 34 9180 ways to match exactly four white balls but not the red one, giving a probability of 9180/175,223,510, or approximately 1/19,088. Three White Balls and One Red Another way to win a prize of $100 is to match exactly three of the five white balls and also match the red one. There are C(5,3) 10 ways to match three of the five. The remaining white balls must be one of the remaining 54 that were not drawn, and so there are C(54, 2) 1431 ways for this to happen. There is one way to match the red ball. This means that there are 10 x 1431 x 1 14,310 ways to match exactly three white balls and the red one, giving a probability of 14,310/175,223,510, or approximately 1/12,245. Three White Balls and No Red One way to win a prize of $7 is to match exactly three of the five white balls and not match the red one. There are C(5,3) 10 ways to match three of the five. The remaining white balls must be one of the remaining 54 that were not drawn, and so there are C(54, 2) 1431 ways for this to happen. This time there are 34 ways to not match the red ball. This means that there are 10 x 1431 x 34 486,540 ways to match exactly three white balls but not the red one, giving a probability of 486,540/175,223,510, or approximately 1/360. Two White Balls and One Red Another way to win a prize of $7 is to match exactly two of the five white balls and also match the red one. There are C(5,2) 10 ways to match two of the five. The remaining white balls must be one of the remaining 54 that were not drawn, and so there are C(54, 3) 24,804 ways for this to happen. There is one way to match the red ball. This means that there are 10 x 24,804 x 1 248,040 ways to match exactly two white balls and the red one, giving a probability of 248,040/175,223,510, or approximately 1/706. One White Ball and One Red One way to win a prize of $4 is to match exactly one of the five white balls and also match the red one. There are C(5,4) 5 ways to match one of the five. The remaining white balls must be one of the remaining 54 that were not drawn, and so there are C(54, 4) 316,251 ways for this to happen. There is one way to match the red ball. This means that there are 5 x 316,251 x1 1,581,255 ways to match exactly one white ball and the red one, giving a probability of 1,581,255/175,223,510, or approximately 1/111. One Red Ball Another way to win a prize of $4 is to match none of the five white balls but match the red one. There are 54 balls that are not any of the five selected, and we have C(54, 5) 3,162,510 ways for this to happen. There is one way to match the red ball. This means that there are 3,162,510 ways to match none of the balls except for the red one, giving a probability of 3,162,510/175,223,510, or approximately 1/55. This case is somewhat counterintuitive. There are 36 red balls, so we may think that the probability of matching one of them would be 1/36. However, this neglects the other conditions imposed by the white balls. Many combinations involving the correct red ball also include matches on some of the white balls as well.

More stewardship is needed Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

More stewardship is needed - Essay Example In terms of the planet's resources, stewardship would simply entail taking care of what one has, whether an individual, family, company, or government. Now we come to the crux of the problem, being the aforementioned. Everyone is different and there is no common agreement in regard to "the needs of the people." In thinking stewardship, fashion takes a back seat. In developed nations, fashion is part of success. Since each nation and government is divided into sections of differing cultures, we can view the United States as a good example of where stewardship takes on different meanings; The region of the Pacific Northwest carries the trophy for being ecologically aware, having begun some of the nation's first recycling programs for glass, aluminum and plastic back in the '70's. One part of stewardship is responsibly disposing of waste, and as the population grows, so does waste. The term, "reduce, reuse, recycle" abounds in stewardship thinking. Stewardship is a big inconvenience. It means we must think about what we do, what we use and how we get rid of it.

Developing a Health Policy Campaign Coursework Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Developing a Health Policy Campaign - Coursework Example Every time an individual consumes excess calories that what the body requires, obesity sets in. No one admires to be obese. People with obesity have high probabilities of suffering from heart diseases as well as other dangerous diseases. But what exactly causes obesity? Besides hereditary factors, overeating plays a key role in causing obesity. Similarly consumption of foods that have high fat content and decreased physical activity, are also prime causes of this condition. In US, children obesity cases pose a great challenge. Studies have shown that at least one third of children in America including adolescents are facing obesity. Statistics have shown that obesity is on a rapid increase, â€Å"Over the past 30 years, the prevalence of obesity has nearly tripled for children 2 to 5 years of age and youth 12 to 19 years of age, and it has quadrupled for children 6 to 11 years old.† (AHA conference proceedings 2014, 1) We have had highly effective programs advocating for the issues of obesity in children, these programs have proved very effective in a number of ways. In the literature review in the advocacy program by the nurses, the following approaches which made it effective (Progress in Preventing Childhood Obesity, 2006). These skills that nurses employed to prevent obesity were good, they put in place a number critical issues. They considered prevention levels that were good enough for the child, and the family among other important considerations. The obesity prevention strategy was taken to be a health tool. There were advocacy skills involved in planning and strategizing on preventive measures within the community and the entire population. (Online journal of issues in nursing, 2009) In overall, many of the advocacy programs that were initiated were effective because of willing of partners that were interested in the issues of child obesity. Various local, national, regional and international bodies are trying their best to combat

Punctuation And Capitalization Essay Example for Free

Punctuation And Capitalization Essay As a Communications teacher, Ive found that one effective way to improve punctuation is to look for punctuation errors and correct them, explaining why the correction needs to be made. â€Å"Convictions are more dangerous foes of truth than lies,† wrote the philosopher. Some key vitamins and minerals found in milk are vitamin D, calcium, and vitamin A. The animal quacks like a duck, waddles like a duck, and looks like a duck; therefore, it must be a duck. Several countries have ratified the agreement: France, Canada, Denmark, Spain, and Luxembourg. â€Å"Of course,† Mary agreed, â€Å"Ill complete the project next week.† The weather forecast is for rain; however, I still plan to run the marathon this Sunday. Its important that the dog receives its vaccination this week. My parent has moved north of Madison, Wisconsin. Next term, I would like to take courses in algebra, biology and art history.   References Straus, Jane. (2005). The Blue Book of Grammar and Punctuation. Retrieved December 10, 2007, from http://www.grammarbook.com/punctuation/cnt_punc.asp

Comparing The Simpsons and Aristophanes Clouds Essay -- comparison, c

Tomorrow on the Simpsons, Homer will discover that Bart has stolen his credit card and charged $10,000 worth of "Itchy and Scratchy" merchandise. Having no hope for paying off this debt, Homer decides to go to law school because he cannot afford to hire a bankruptcy lawyer. The famous lawyer, who teaches classes, sends a crestfallen Homer home to retrieve his son, for Homer is much too thick-headed to possibly learn the ways of the courts. As Bart graduates from law school, he uses his newfound skills of argument to convince the courts that his parents are insane, his sister Lisa deserves to be in a boarding school, and he should be able to put his youngest sister up for adoption. Unable to see another way, Homer tears down the walls of the Springfield Law School, attacking the famous lawyer for ruining his life. On many levels, this is a typical episode of The Simpsons, one I am sure any Simpson's fan would enjoy. The only problem is this is not an episode of The Simpsons, and it wi ll not be airing tomorrow. This synopsis did not come from the TV Guide, rather it is an updated version of Aristophanes' famous comedy, Clouds. Though it may come as a surprise, many of the elements of America's favorite cartoon are actually the same elements used by Aristophanes many centuries ago in his comedic drama, Clouds. There are many similarities between the main characters of Aristophanes' Clouds and the modern television favorite The Simpsons. The first comparison to be made is between the father figures Strepsiades and Homer Simpson. Though separated by centuries of changes, Strepsiades and Homer share a surprising number of basic character traits. First, they share a lack of intellectual strength; put simply, both characters are incre... ...98. Carey, Donick. The Simpsons Archive. "D'oh-in' in the Wind." 6 Nov. 2000. Ed. Benjamin Robinson. 6 Sept. 2011. Chen, Raymond, Ed. The Simpsons Archive. "Treehouse of Horror II" 6 Nov. 2000. 6 Sept. 2011. Greaney, Dan. The Simpsons Archive. "I'm With Cupid." 6 Nov. 2000. Ed. Benjamin Robinson. 6 Sept. 2011. Meyer, George. The Simpsons Archive. "Homer the Heretic." 6. Nov. 2000. Ed. Chris Baird. 6 Sept. 2011. Scully, Mike. The Simpsons Archive. "Lisa's Rival." 6 Nov. 2000. Ed. James A. Cherry. 6 Sept. 2011. Vitti, Jon. The Simpsons Archive. "Mr. Plow." 6 Nov. 2000. Ed. James A. Cherry. 6 Sept. 2011.

Loser : Microsoft

â€Å"Still, though Microsoft’s goals are good, it’s implementation needs work.† This was Philip E. Ross’s main point in his article â€Å"Loser: Microsoft to Spammers: Go Phish.† In the article, Ross discussed the two spam e-mail countermeasures developed separately by Microsoft and the partnership of Cisco and Yahoo. Although he admitted that the systems developed – Sender ID by Microsoft and Domain Keys Identified Mail (DKIM) by Cisco/Yahoo – had their own advantages, he also confesses to believing that DKIM is the better anti-spam proposal. He goes as far as writing, â€Å"For our purposes, that makes Microsoft Corp. the loser.† After discussing the difference between Microsoft’s and Cisco/Yahoo’s designs – a Sender ID verifies that an e-mail really came from where it claims to have come from by comparing the message’s Internet Protocol address from the IP address of its claimed origin; while DKIM tacks an encrypted digital signature to the e-mail’s header and this signature contains instructions on where to find the algorithm – Ross reveals the one great loophole to Microsoft’s Sender ID. It is not able to differentiate between spam and forwarded e-mail. And Ross says this can make or break Microsoft’s anti-spam system. As Ross says, the only way to get around Sender ID’s glitch is to cut and paste a message you plan to forward. But this, Ross explains, makes sharing harder; thus, possibly resulting to lesser people e-mailing. Although Ross presents Cisco’s Jim Fenton’s claim that DKIM also has its own fault in that it is more easily confused by e-mail changes while in transit, he still has another negative comment on Microsoft. He mentions critics’ speculations that Microsoft may have other things in mind with the control of spam e-mails – speculations that may have stemmed from the company’s tight grip on Sender ID’s intellectual property. Yet even with this presentation of arguments against Microsoft’s Sender ID, Ross still believes that the Redmond, Washington computer giant is serious about eliminating spam and that they have what it takes to come up with the standard in spam countermeasures. For now though, Microsoft’s intentions are not enough and they have yet to work towards polishing their processes. Philip Ross made a well-informed article with â€Å"Loser: Microsoft to Spammers: Go Phish†. He was able to provide evidences to all his claims and was able to back-up his assumptions. But even with a fair presentation of both sides to Microsoft’s Sender ID, Ross still had the tendency to settle more on the negative side of the system. This was especially apparent when he brandished Microsoft as the â€Å"loser†, when a less negative term could have sufficed. Ross’s points, though a little biased, were admittedly insightful. His mention of Microsoft’s attempt at secreting their anti-spam technology’s intellectual property does make one wonder why such a secrecy. I do hope that assumptions on the possibility of this technology being exploited will turn out to be not true – because true to Ross’ words, nobody wants to be strong-armed. However, even I have to agree with Ross’s suggestion that perhaps Cisco and Yahoo can add Microsoft to their team and all three can work towards a stronger anti-spam system. Since the fight against spamming is not about one company’s supremacy over another but about making e-mail more reliable for all users, Cisco, Yahoo, and Microsoft must try to work together for the benefit of millions of e-mail users. And it was good that even Fenton and Microsoft’s Harry Katz concur that this is a good idea. Philip Ross may have his own biases regarding Microsoft’s Sender ID and it was slightly apparent in the article. But his proposal for making the current situation better is indeed something that current industry bigwigs should look at. Reference Ross, Philip E. (2007). Loser: Microsoft to Spammers: Go Phish. In Spectrum Online. Retrieved September 28, 2007, from http://www.spectrum.iee